<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>IREPAS - International Rebar Producers and Exporters Association &#187; Mexico</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.irepas.com/?feed=rss2&#038;tag=mexico" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.irepas.com</link>
	<description>ıIREPAS gathers producers, traders and consumers of steel rebars, wire rods, sections as well as suppliers of ferrous scrap and steel raw materials</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 07:06:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>US issues final antidumping duty results on wire rod from Mexico</title>
		<link>https://www.irepas.com/?p=6523&#038;utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=us-issues-final-antidumping-duty-results-on-wire-rod-from-mexico</link>
		<comments>https://www.irepas.com/?p=6523#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 22:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Irepas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antidumping (AD)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ArcelorMittal Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comercializadora Eloro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deacero]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ingeteknos Fabricaciones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Optimatiks Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protectionism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TA 2000 S.A. de C.V.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ternium Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US DOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Villacero]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wire rod]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.irepas.com/?p=6523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The US Department of Commerce (DOC) has released the final results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod (wire rod) from Mexico for the period between October 1, 2023, and September 30, 2024. The DOC determined that Deacero S.A.P.I. de C.V. and Deacero Summit [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The US Department of Commerce (DOC) has released the final results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod (wire rod) from Mexico for the period between October 1, 2023, and September 30, 2024.</p>
<p>The DOC determined that Deacero S.A.P.I. de C.V. and Deacero Summit S.A.P.I. de C.V., treated as a single entity, made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value during the period of review. The DOC has determined a weighted-average dumping margin of 14.67 percent for the entity.</p>
<p>According to the preliminary results, the weighted-average dumping margin was determined at 15.97 percent.</p>
<p>The DOC also rescinded the review with respect to seven companies, namely ArcelorMittal Mexico S.A. de C.V., Comercializadora Eloro, S.A., Grupo Villacero S.A. de C.V., Ingeteknos Fabricaciones S.A. de C.V., Ternium Mexico S.A. de C.V., Optimatiks Mexico S.A. de C.V., and TA 2000 S.A. de C.V., as there were no reviewable, suspended entries of subject merchandise from these companies during the period of review.</p>
<p>The all-others rate is 20.11 percent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.irepas.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=6523</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canada to extend steel tariff measures for one year</title>
		<link>https://www.irepas.com/?p=6503&#038;utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=canada-to-extend-steel-tariff-measures-for-one-year</link>
		<comments>https://www.irepas.com/?p=6503#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 09:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Irepas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CUSMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protectionism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tariff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Department of Finance Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.irepas.com/?p=6503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Canadian government has announced that it will extend key steel and aluminum tariff measures for one year in order to support domestic workers and businesses, while maintaining protection against steel trade diversion, non-market practices and global excess capacity. According to a statement released by the Department of Finance, Canada will extend its steel tariff-rate [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Canadian government has announced that it will extend key steel and aluminum tariff measures for one year in order to support domestic workers and businesses, while maintaining protection against steel trade diversion, non-market practices and global excess capacity.</p>
<p>According to a statement released by the Department of Finance, Canada will extend its steel tariff-rate quota regime for imports from non-CUSMA partners until June 27, 2027, while the existing horizontal tariff relief for eligible steel and aluminum products from the US, as well as for eligible steel products subject to derivative tariffs, will be extended until June 30, 2027. The Department of Finance Canada stated that the extension will provide producers and importers with greater business predictability and longer-term certainty, while helping the government defend the Canadian steel industry and its workers against the impact of trade flows driven by excess capacity and unfair market conditions.</p>
<p>Under the current framework, quota levels will remain based on 20 percent of 2024 import volumes for partners without a free trade agreement with Canada and 75 percent of 2024 import volumes for partners that have a free trade agreement in force with Canada, while imports exceeding the quota limits will continue to be subject to a 50 percent tariff. Canada will also continue to exempt the US and Mexico from the steel tariff-rate quotas.</p>
<p>Following the planned extension, the government intends to consider an allocations-based approach for the administration of quotas for certain product classes, with producers and importers expected to be invited to share their views as part of the ongoing review of the tariff-rate quota framework.</p>
<table class="MsoNormalTable" style="mso-cellspacing: 0cm; mso-yfti-tbllook: 1184; mso-padding-alt: 0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr style="mso-yfti-irow: 0; mso-yfti-firstrow: yes; mso-yfti-lastrow: yes;">
<td style="border: none; border-bottom: dotted #DDDDDD 1.0pt; mso-border-bottom-alt: dotted #DDDDDD .75pt; padding: 0cm 7.5pt 11.25pt 7.5pt;"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.irepas.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=6503</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US maintains AD/CVD order on rebar imports from Mexico and Turkey</title>
		<link>https://www.irepas.com/?p=6460&#038;utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=us-maintains-adcvd-order-on-rebar-imports-from-mexico-and-turkey</link>
		<comments>https://www.irepas.com/?p=6460#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 22:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Irepas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antidumping (AD)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counterveiling (CVD)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protectionism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rebar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sunset review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turkey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US DOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.irepas.com/?p=6460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The US Department of Commerce (DOC) has announced the final results of the sunset reviews of the antidumping duty (AD) order on reinforcing bar imports from Mexico and the countervailing duty (CVD) order on reinforcing bar imports from Turkey. The DOC has determined that revocation of the antidumping duty and countervailing duty orders on the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The US Department of Commerce (DOC) has announced the final results of the sunset reviews of the antidumping duty (AD) order on reinforcing bar imports from Mexico and the countervailing duty (CVD) order on reinforcing bar imports from Turkey.</p>
<p>The DOC has determined that revocation of the antidumping duty and countervailing duty orders on the given products from Mexico and Turkey would likely to lead to the continuation or reoccurrence of dumping, countervailable subsidies and material injury.</p>
<p>The estimated weighted-average dumping margin for Mexico are at 20.58 percent and 66.70 percent, while subsidy rates are 6.58 percent and 7.71 percent for Turkish companies.</p>
<p>The products subject to the orders are currently classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under subheadings 7213.10.0000, 7214.20.0000, and 7228.30.8010.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.irepas.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=6460</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US ITC votes to maintain duties on wire rod imports from five countries</title>
		<link>https://www.irepas.com/?p=6398&#038;utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=us-itc-votes-to-maintain-duties-on-wire-rod-imports-from-five-countries</link>
		<comments>https://www.irepas.com/?p=6398#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2026 23:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Irepas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antidumping (AD)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counterveiling (CVD)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indonesia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moldova]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protectionism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trinidad and Tobago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US ITC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wire rod]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.irepas.com/?p=6398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The US International Trade Commission (ITC) has determined that revoking the existing antidumping duty order on wire rod from Brazil, Indonesia, Mexico, Moldova, and Trinidad and Tobago or the countervailing duty order on wire rod from Brazil would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. As [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The US International Trade Commission (ITC) has determined that revoking the existing antidumping duty order on wire rod from Brazil, Indonesia, Mexico, Moldova, and Trinidad and Tobago or the countervailing duty order on wire rod from Brazil would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. As a result of the ITC’s affirmative determination, the existing order on imports of this product from these countries will remain in place.</p>
<p>The weighted-average dumping margins stand at</p>
<ul>
<li>74.35-94.73 percent for Brazil,</li>
<li>4.06 percent for Indonesia,</li>
<li>20.11 percent for Mexico,</li>
<li>369.10 percent for Moldova</li>
<li>11.40 percent for Trinidad and Tobago,</li>
</ul>
<p>while Brazil is also subject to 2.76-6.74 percent countervailing duty.</p>
<p>The subject merchandise is provided for in subheadings</p>
<ul>
<li>7213.91.3000,</li>
<li>7213.91.3010,</li>
<li>7213.91.3011,</li>
<li>7213.91.3015,</li>
<li>7213.91.3020,</li>
<li>7213.91.3090,</li>
<li>7213.91.3091,</li>
<li>7213.91.3092,</li>
<li>7213.91.3093,</li>
<li>7213.91.4500,</li>
<li>7213.91.4510,</li>
<li>7213.91.4590,</li>
<li>7213.91.6000,</li>
<li>7213.91.6010,</li>
<li>7213.91.6090,</li>
<li>7213.99.0030,</li>
<li>7213.99.0031,</li>
<li>7213.99.0038,</li>
<li>7213.99.0090,</li>
<li>7227.20.0000,</li>
<li>7227.20.0010,</li>
<li>7227.20.0020,</li>
<li>7227.20.0030,</li>
<li>7227.20.0080,</li>
<li>7227.20.0090,</li>
<li>7227.20.0095,</li>
<li>7227.90.6010,</li>
<li>7227.90.6020,</li>
<li>7227.90.6050,</li>
<li>7227.90.6051,</li>
<li>7227.90.6053,</li>
<li>7227.90.6058,</li>
<li>7227.90.6059,</li>
<li>7227.90.6080,</li>
<li>7227.90.6085</li>
</ul>
<p>of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.irepas.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=6398</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US issues preliminary results of antidumping order on wire rod imports from Mexico</title>
		<link>https://www.irepas.com/?p=6391&#038;utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=us-issues-preliminary-results-of-antidumping-order-on-wire-rod-imports-from-mexico</link>
		<comments>https://www.irepas.com/?p=6391#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2026 22:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Irepas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antidumping (AD)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deacero]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protectionism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US DOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wire rod]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.irepas.com/?p=6391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The US Department of Commerce (DOC) has issued the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod from Mexico for the period of review between October 1, 2023, and September 30, 2024. The DOC has preliminarily found that Deacero S.A.P.I. de C.V./Deacero Summit S.A.P.I. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The US Department of Commerce (DOC) has issued the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod from Mexico for the period of review between October 1, 2023, and September 30, 2024.</p>
<p>The DOC has preliminarily found that Deacero S.A.P.I. de C.V./Deacero Summit S.A.P.I. de C.V. made sales of the subject merchandise at prices below normal value during the period of review. The DOC has preliminarily determined an estimated weighted-average dumping margin of 15.97 percent for Deacero S.A.P.I. de C.V./Deacero Summit S.A.P.I. de C.V.</p>
<p>The DOC has also rescinded this review, in part, with respect to seven companies for which there were no reviewable entries of the subject merchandise during the period of review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.irepas.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=6391</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Short Range Outlook : December 2025</title>
		<link>https://www.irepas.com/?p=6345&#038;utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=short-range-outlook-december-2025</link>
		<comments>https://www.irepas.com/?p=6345#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2025 17:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Irepas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBAM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outlook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rebar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scrap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turkey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USSupreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wire rod]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.irepas.com/?p=6345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No holiday cheer in global longs market &#8211; rising costs add to already weak demand As we approach the holiday season, the general atmosphere in the global long steel products market is still cloudy. To sum up the market situation, demand is weak everywhere, with the approach of the holiday season exacerbating this situation, while [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>No holiday cheer in global longs market &#8211; rising costs add to already weak demand</strong></p>
<p>As we approach the holiday season, the general atmosphere in the global long steel products market is still cloudy. To sum up the market situation, demand is weak everywhere, with the approach of the holiday season exacerbating this situation, while costs are rising, China is producing a little less but is still exporting. The net effect is that the supply-demand balance has not improved, it has just shifted for different reasons. Decreases in consumption globally have put demand in a weak situation, with customers not yet observing any rises in consumption on the horizon which would give them hope for brighter market prospects.</p>
<p><strong>EU market more cost-driven than before, scrap supply tighter</strong></p>
<p>What has changed in the market is the cost structure. Scrap supply in Europe is tighter than usual, possibly in expectation of CBAM in 2026. Combined with higher electricity prices, this has pushed prices higher even though finished steel demand has not changed. So, the market is now even more cost-driven than last month.</p>
<p><strong>New EU safeguard measures give brief boost, but demand shrinking in general</strong></p>
<p>We have seen some price increases and a relative rise in demand in the EU due to the announcement of new safeguard measures. However, this improvement is temporary. Demand in the EU is shrinking in general despite promised infrastructure projects and a lack of apartments. The capacities of EU producers have increased over the past 12 months again, which increases the imbalance in the market. Despite the upcoming CBAM and tougher safeguard rulings, prices in the EU have been increasing only by very small margins due to low demand. No change is in sight.</p>
<p><strong>China still exports at full speed, production cuts make little difference</strong></p>
<p>On the supply side, China is finally showing real production cuts. In the first 10 months of the year, China’s crude steel output amounted to 817.87 million metric tons, down 3.9 percent year on year. This is the first meaningful drop in a while and should, in theory, take some pressure off the global balance. But as long as the tonnages they actually produce continue to flow abroad, the practical impact of the reduction in output is limited. In reality, China is still exporting at full speed because their domestic consumption is dropping even further. On the other hand, the export market is more attractive for the Chinese. Any changes in the rest of the world will have little impact on Chinese exports, as hopes fade of a stimulus by Beijing to boost domestic steel consumption.</p>
<p><strong>Projects put on hold in US due to high interest rates</strong></p>
<p>In the US, demand is still flat. Due to year-end taxes, most stockists are trying to reduce their inventories. Buying decisions are being pushed to 2026. Infrastructure investments are slow and due to high interest rates residential and commercial construction projects are put on hold, waiting for further interest rate cuts. Imports are reduced due to high duty and competition from domestic production.</p>
<p><strong>Many countries still hoping to negotiate tariff exemptions with US</strong></p>
<p>Many countries are trying to find a way to negotiate with the US to gain exemptions from tariffs, especially Mexico. The EU will probably also offer a new deal to the US once its new safeguard is in place. Any exemption will of course change the dynamics of the market.</p>
<p><strong>Turkey’s scrap imports decline, sensitive to increases in scrap costs</strong></p>
<p>Sudden increases in scrap prices will also cause production cuts in Turkey. Turkey’s scrap imports declined by 7.3 percent to 15.23 million mt in the first 10 months of 2025. The import volumes in the corresponding periods since 2020 varied in the range of 18-20 million mt.</p>
<p><strong>Great uncertainty predominates in very unstable market situation</strong></p>
<p>There are factors creating tremendous uncertainty in the global longs market, such as CBAM and the awaited ruling of the US Supreme Court on the legality of Trump’s tariffs, which make future planning extremely difficult. Meanwhile, competition in the market is intense but for low volumes. Under these circumstances, the current situation in the market can be described as very unstable.</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><em>DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE? </em></strong><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><em>PLEASE LEAVE A COMMENT AND SHARE YOUR OPINION WITH US</em></strong><strong>        </strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.irepas.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=6345</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IREPAS in Munich : Protectionism and China</title>
		<link>https://www.irepas.com/?p=6300&#038;utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=irepas-in-munich-protectionism-and-china</link>
		<comments>https://www.irepas.com/?p=6300#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2025 14:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Irepas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press Releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[93rd IREPAS meeting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baysal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[billet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Björkman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBAM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cebecioglu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DRI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrogen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meeting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Munich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OECD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Producers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protectionism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raw Material Suppliers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rebar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safeguard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scrap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 232]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SteelOrbis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Traders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turkey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US DOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wire rod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work Plan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.irepas.com/?p=6300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 93rd meeting of IREPAS (the International Rebar Exporters and Producers Association) was held in Munich on September 28-30 in conjunction with the SteelOrbis Fall’25 Conference. There were 123 representatives from 49 different producers among the 406 registered delegates from a total of 56 different countries. There were also 79 registrations representing 41 different raw [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 93rd meeting of IREPAS (the International Rebar Exporters and Producers Association) was held in Munich on September 28-30 in conjunction with the SteelOrbis Fall’25 Conference.</p>
<p>There were 123 representatives from 49 different producers among the 406 registered delegates from a total of 56 different countries. There were also 79 registrations representing 41 different raw material suppliers.</p>
<p>At the opening of the conference, Murat Cebecioglu, chairman of IREPAS, said that demand is still very weak in the global longs market and the situation remains difficult as mills are cutting back on production and protectionist measures are continuing full speed ahead, while China and other countries in Asia are exporting a lot, putting pressure on prices.</p>
<p>The IREPAS chairman added that there is very severe competition in the market, and every producer is fighting with its last penny in order to keep operating.</p>
<p>On the last day of the conference, producers of long steel products, as well as traders and raw material suppliers, shared the conclusions reached at their special committee meetings regarding the current situation in the markets with the general participants at the event.</p>
<p><strong>Raw Material Suppliers at IREPAS: Global trade conditions are “devastating” due to uncertainty</strong></p>
<p>Jens Björkman, the chairman of the raw material suppliers committee, said that, in the recent period, global trade conditions have been extremely difficult, describing the situation as “devastating” amid the current uncertainty. Pointing out that trade barriers and uncertainties continue to weigh heavily on the market, particularly with the US tariffs forcing some countries to find alternative destinations, he added that this shift has created pressure on other markets, including Turkey. Regarding the protectionism in the market, he stated that there are rumors that the EU will impose some duties on Asian materials due to the huge inflows of cheaper steel from the region. Meanwhile, noting that China, which is the main exporter of cheap steel, has signaled plans to reduce steel production and exports in 2025 and 2026, albeit the actual outcome remains uncertain, he said that, in the longer term, larger investments in EAF-based production are expected, supported by stable electricity supply and growing domestic scrap availability. China has also announced a cut of about 90 million metric tons in its steel production in 2025.</p>
<p>Highlighting that the planned green transition in the steel industry is increasingly being questioned, with many investments being cancelled and projects being delayed, Mr. Björkman stated that the EU’s move toward electric furnace-based production has now been postponed by at least three to four years. He underlined that, if carbon emission trading in Europe and the related pricing system are fully implemented, emission reduction technologies will need to be installed more widely. However, he said that, instead of hydrogen-based DRI, natural gas could be used in the short term. In addition, the raw materials committee chairman said EU waste shipment regulations treating scrap as waste will create more bureaucracy, especially for non-OECD countries needing formal approvals to buy European scrap, while OECD trade remains unaffected. Regarding the concerns over domestic scrap oversupply, he stated that Europe already faces excess supply overall, but certain grades like clean automotive scrap could face shortages. This imbalance, he explained, is why EU steel producers push to keep scrap within Europe.</p>
<p>Looking at Turkey, Björkman noted that the recent increase in freight costs has become a burden for suppliers, leading prices to increase slightly in Turkey, though how long this situation will last remains difficult to predict. Regarding the changes in Turkey’s inward processing regime, the committee chairman stated that Turkish mills, who are already struggling amid high costs, may become less competitive in the short term as scrap prices may increase slightly, leading the mills to reduce production.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, stating that raw material demand in the GCC market is expected to focus more on DRI/HBI, which remains limited in supply, he emphasized that larger volumes will be needed in Europe to support flat steel production and the green transition, though a mix of DRI/HBI and scrap is likely to be used.</p>
<p><strong>Traders at IREPAS: Protectionist measures will continue for foreseeable future</strong></p>
<p>F.D. Baysal, the chairman of the traders committee, said that China’s exports have increased at a much higher pace than its production. He stated that there are no expectations for production cuts in China and that its domestic stock levels remain at normal levels. In response to questions on how China is reacting to trade barriers, he explained that Chinese producers have begun investing in production facilities in other regions, including Africa and South America.</p>
<p>Looking at Turkey, Mr. Baysal said that the high cost of energy remains a key challenge for Turkish mills. He noted that, in order to save energy and comply with CBAM regulations, Turkish producers have started investing in solar and renewable energy sources, which are expected to reduce production costs. Meanwhile, saying that there are no clear plans in the EU to ease green transition requirements, though delays remain a possibility, he commented that CBAM will eventually be enforced, but significant work is still needed to establish reference levels for both European and overseas mills. He added that, despite uncertainties, European producers are already moving from blast furnaces to EAFs and investing in renewable energy sources such as solar to balance costs and meet future carbon requirements.</p>
<p>Commenting on protectionist measures, the committee chairman stated that the Trump administration’s tariffs, reaching 75-100 percent in some cases, have nearly halted steel imports into the US, while Canada and Mexico have also imposed strong protective measures, leaving the North American market heavily restricted. Stating that he believes that protectionist measures will continue for the foreseeable future, Baysal said that further barriers against cheaper Asian steel are likely, but stressed that free trade remains the best option, though current trends are moving in the opposite direction.</p>
<p>Regarding prices, he highlighted that the current spread between rebar and scrap prices stands at around $200 or slightly less. He suggested that this points to a likely regression in scrap prices. He also compared production methods, stating that blast furnaces currently hold a cost advantage of about $25/mt over electric arc furnaces as the latter depend on electricity prices, though these are lower in countries like the US. On freight, Baysal noted that container freight rates have come down from post-Covid highs of around $4,000 to about $1,200, adding that he does not expect them to fall further.</p>
<p><strong>Producers at IREPAS: Chinese exports and protectionism squeeze global steel industry</strong></p>
<p>Murat Cebecioglu, chairman of IREPAS and also chairman of the producers committee, said that, as demand is very limited, everybody is trying to protect what is theirs. “We can sell to the EU only once every three months because of the quota and it fills up as soon as the quota is opened. Because of China we cannot sell to many places. Chinese exports are hurting everyone,” he explained. The committee chairman pointed out that China is the main driver, exporting heavily at low prices, exerting pressure everywhere amid generally limited demand. Many countries are imposing protective measures not only on China but also on some other Asian countries, considering that the Chinese are quick to move their production elsewhere to avoid trade barriers.</p>
<p>Regarding Turkish mills’ capacity utilization rates, Mr. Cebecioglu pointed out that, under current market conditions, utilization rates are not at decent levels and, with protectionist measures still in place, Turkey has limited space to export, with only a few countries left, and competition is very tough in those countries. He also added that the countries to which Turkey used to export have become exporters themselves and this affects Turkish production in return. Turkey’s steel production capacity stands at around 60 million mt, but the country is currently producing just 38 million mt. In addition to trade measures, China is exporting heavily all around the world and, as it is difficult to give low prices to compete with the Chinese, in the end Turkish mills have to cut production, he remarked.</p>
<p>Commenting on China’s work plan for the steel industry in 2025-26, the IREPAS chairman underlined that the Chinese are always coming up with some kind of plan, but it is yet to be seen how much of it will be implemented and how they will proceed. This work plan, he noted, consists of many things; regulations, environmental constraints, shutting of inefficient mills, and technological upgrading for green steel and low carbon production. In the end, future competition will depend on being cleaner, he stressed. He also commented that, if this Chinese work plan goes through, it will mean that there will be export regulations, leaving room for Turkish mills to breath.</p>
<p>Talking about the mega projects in the GCC region, Cebecioglu said that demand is quite good in the region and GCC-based mills are also exporting to the EU and North African countries, where they are very competitive against the Turkish mills. As GCC mills have lower costs compared to Turkish mills, they have the upper hand in prices in terms of costs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.irepas.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=6300</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US issues final results for antidumping review on rebar imports from Mexico</title>
		<link>https://www.irepas.com/?p=6292&#038;utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=us-issues-final-results-for-antidumping-review-on-rebar-imports-from-mexico</link>
		<comments>https://www.irepas.com/?p=6292#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2025 15:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Irepas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antidumping (AD)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deacero]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I.N.G.E.T.E.K.N.O.S. Estructurales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rebar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[S.A. de C.V.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TA 2000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TA 2000 S.A. de C.V.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US DOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.irepas.com/?p=6292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The US Department of Commerce (DOC) has issued the final results of the antidumping duty administrative review of reinforcing bar imports from Mexico for the period between November 1, 2022, and October 31, 2023. The DOC has determined Deacero S.A.P.I. de C.V. and I.N.G.E.T.E.K.N.O.S. Estructurales, S.A. de C.V. (collectively, Deacero Group); and TA 2000 S.A. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The US Department of Commerce (DOC) has issued the final results of the antidumping duty administrative review of reinforcing bar imports from Mexico for the period between November 1, 2022, and October 31, 2023.</p>
<p>The DOC has determined Deacero S.A.P.I. de C.V. and I.N.G.E.T.E.K.N.O.S. Estructurales, S.A. de C.V. (collectively, Deacero Group); and TA 2000 S.A. de C.V. (TA 2000) sold rebar from Mexico in the US at less than normal value during the period of review. The DOC has determined the following weighted-average dumping margins:</p>
<ul>
<li>32.05 percent for Deacero Group</li>
<li>22.27 percent for TA 2000.</li>
</ul>
<p>Compared to the preliminary results, the weighted-average dumping margins were 8.88 percent for Deacero Group and 22.27 percent for TA 2000.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.irepas.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=6292</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mexico initiates antidumping review on rebar imports from Brazil</title>
		<link>https://www.irepas.com/?p=6265&#038;utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=mexico-initiates-antidumping-review-on-rebar-imports-from-brazil</link>
		<comments>https://www.irepas.com/?p=6265#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2025 22:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Irepas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antidumping (AD)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ArcelorMittal Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deacero]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grupo Simec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protectionism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rebar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ternium]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.irepas.com/?p=6265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Mexican government has initiated an antidumping duty review on reinforcing bar imports from Brazil, according to the official Mexican gazette. The review period is set from July 1, 2024 to June 30, 2025, and the analysis period is set from July 1, 2020 to June 30, 2025. The product is imported through tariff item [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Mexican government has initiated an antidumping duty review on reinforcing bar imports from Brazil, according to the official Mexican gazette. The review period is set from July 1, 2024 to June 30, 2025, and the analysis period is set from July 1, 2020 to June 30, 2025.</p>
<p>The product is imported through tariff item 7214.20.02 of the General Import and Export Taxes Law (TIGIE). The temporary antidumping duty for the product has stood at 35 percent since 2024. The review was requested by Mexican steel producers ArcelorMittal, Ternium, Deacero, and Grupo Simec.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.irepas.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=6265</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US issues final antidumping margins for wire rod imports from Mexico</title>
		<link>https://www.irepas.com/?p=6259&#038;utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=us-issues-final-antidumping-margins-for-wire-rod-imports-from-mexico</link>
		<comments>https://www.irepas.com/?p=6259#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2025 22:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Irepas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antidumping (AD)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deacero]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protectionism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TA 2000 S.A. de C.V.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US DOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wire rod]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.irepas.com/?p=6259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The US Department of Commerce (DOC) has announced the final results of its administrative review of the antidumping duty order on carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod imports from Mexico between October 1, 2022, and September 30, 2023. The US Department of Commerce has determined that producers/exporters subject to this review made sales of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The US Department of Commerce (DOC) has announced the final results of its administrative review of the antidumping duty order on carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod imports from Mexico between October 1, 2022, and September 30, 2023.</p>
<p>The US Department of Commerce has determined that producers/exporters subject to this review made sales of the subject merchandise at less than normal value during the period of review. The DOC has calculated the following estimated weighted-average dumping margins:</p>
<ul>
<li>Deacero S.A.P.I. de C.V : 13.45 percent</li>
<li>TA 2000 S.A. de C.V.  : 18.09</li>
</ul>
<p>According to the preliminary results, the estimated weighted-average dumping margin was at 13.46 percent for Deacero S.A.P.I. de C.V. and 18.09 for TA 2000 S.A. de C.V.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://www.irepas.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=6259</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
