The tribunal concluded that allowing the measures to expire would likely result in injury to Canada’s domestic rebar industry and therefore ordered their continuation. Under the decision, Canada will continue applying antidumping duties on reinforcing bar imports from China, South Korea and Turkey, and countervailing duties on rebar imports from China.

The current antidumping duties on rebar from the countries in question are at

• 26.6 percent for China,
• 25.1 percent for South Korea
• 6.5 percent for Turkey,

while subsidy rate is at 6.1 percent for China.

The products currently fall under Harmonized System (HS) tariff classification numbers

• 7213.10.00.11,
• 7213.10.00.12,
• 7213.10.00.13,
• 7213.10.00.90,
• 7214.20.00.11,
• 7214.20.00.12,
• 7214.20.00.13,
• 7214.20.00.14,
• 7214.20.00.21,
• 7214.20.00.22,
• 7214.20.00.23,
• 7214.20.00.24,
• 7214.20.00.31,
• 7214.20.00.32,
• 7214.20.00.33,
• 7214.20.00.34,
• 7214.20.00.90,
• 7215.90.00.20,
• 7215.90.00.30,
• 7227.90.00.50,
• 7228.30.00.51,
• 7228.30.00.52,
• 7228.30.00.53.

According to a statement released by the Department of Finance, Canada will extend its steel tariff-rate quota regime for imports from non-CUSMA partners until June 27, 2027, while the existing horizontal tariff relief for eligible steel and aluminum products from the US, as well as for eligible steel products subject to derivative tariffs, will be extended until June 30, 2027. The Department of Finance Canada stated that the extension will provide producers and importers with greater business predictability and longer-term certainty, while helping the government defend the Canadian steel industry and its workers against the impact of trade flows driven by excess capacity and unfair market conditions.

Under the current framework, quota levels will remain based on 20 percent of 2024 import volumes for partners without a free trade agreement with Canada and 75 percent of 2024 import volumes for partners that have a free trade agreement in force with Canada, while imports exceeding the quota limits will continue to be subject to a 50 percent tariff. Canada will also continue to exempt the US and Mexico from the steel tariff-rate quotas.

Following the planned extension, the government intends to consider an allocations-based approach for the administration of quotas for certain product classes, with producers and importers expected to be invited to share their views as part of the ongoing review of the tariff-rate quota framework.

The overall business environment in the global long steel products market remains relatively stable. However, regional differences have become more pronounced than ever. Protectionist measures in the United States, combined with the implementation of CBAM in Europe and the upcoming reduction of EU import quotas, are reshaping trade patterns and market dynamics.

Ongoing conflicts continue to create uncertainty and raise costs

At the same time, the ongoing conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East continue to create uncertainty, disrupt trade flows and influence supply-demand balances across multiple regions. Higher oil and natural gas prices have increased transportation and production costs, while steel availability from Gulf region suppliers has become extremely limited. Marine insurance costs for cargoes have also risen due to increased geopolitical risks. Expectations that these disruptions will be short-lived have largely disappeared. As a result, many distributors and stockists are holding onto inventories amid concerns about future supply availability and stock replacement costs. Consequently, the market remains highly fragmented, with conditions varying considerably depending on geography.

EU market sees last-minute import buying ahead of new quota system on July 1

In the European Union and in the United Kingdom, the market is now starting to search for a new equilibrium because of the changes in the import regime from July 1. During the past few weeks, some last-minute import buying has been taking place, as buyers and traders try to position themselves before the new quota system enters into effect. After this, market players will have to adjust their strategy to the supply which is actually available in the market. There will still be imports, of course, and there will still be competition, but buyers will have to build their strategies around actual market availability, not around the cheapest theoretical import offer.

Scrap prices remain strong despite weak demand

There is no demand to support the continuing strength of scrap prices, but it seems that prices will stay where they were before the Eid holiday or they may come down by a few dollars to motivate Turkish buyers to resume buying. Deep sea scrap prices for Turkey remain some way above US$400/mt CFR despite weak Turkish rebar sales, while the strong scrap prices provide support for finished product prices. Meanwhile, Turkish mills do not expect much long product demand from the EU because of the new quotas to be introduced shortly in the region. Regional differences will certainly create different results for different regions and producers, especially for those who source scrap from the US and the EU and need to export their products.

Turkey’s production costs may increase, political situation to impact investment

Turkish mills were enjoying cheap energy costs due to the rainfall during the winter season. This will most probably end when temperatures start rising and the country starts using cooling systems. With the political turmoil in the country, investments will slow down, which will also be another factor causing demand for long steel to slacken.

Demand for semis due to Iran’s absence contributes to higher long steel costs

Demand for semis due to Iran’s absence is another factor contributing to increased costs of long products. In this context, Chinese exports of slabs and billets increased to around 900,000 mt in the January-April period this year.

Long steel market in Germany remains very weak

The market in Germany is still very weak. After the shockwave of higher energy prices (the impact of the Iran war) and price increases for all steel products and for logistics, many projects were put on hold. Consequently, cut and bend prices did not move up but are on the way back down. Benders are desperately looking for orders at somehow manageable prices. German and Polish mills have had to adjust prices down as well, otherwise benders do not buy. So, there has been a drop of around €30/mt in prices despite the seasonal improvement which reflects the level of investment in Germany right now. Better prices for benders from imports are practically not available anymore. Reduced quotas, CBAM and high ocean freight rates make business very difficult. New building permits went down by 10-15 percent and industrial projects by 20-30 percent. There is not even any input from the public sector.

Mixed bag of positive and negative factors in US market

In the United States, inflation remains a concern, and expectations for interest rate cuts have largely been pushed back, with higher rates now expected to continue into 2027. This has negatively impacted housing and construction activity, keeping demand relatively subdued. Meanwhile, steel imports remain restricted by the 50 percent Section 232 tariffs, higher freight costs and logistical uncertainties. Reduced import competition continues to support a gradual increase in domestic steel prices despite overall moderate demand. On the other hand, domestic steel prices are moving closer to import parity, which may improve future import opportunities. In addition, inventories remain relatively low, and continued investments in AI infrastructure, energy and industrial projects are providing some support for steel demand. The primary area of growth remains AI infrastructure and data center investments, although this business is largely supplied directly by domestic mills and these big projects are for consumption of reinforcing steel 12-18 months from now. However, these positives are still overshadowed by geopolitical uncertainty, high interest rates and weak construction activity.

Some positive developments in terms of investments

One of the key positives in the marketplace is the substantial level of investment being directed toward infrastructure projects, energy-related developments and data centers, all of which generate significant demand for reinforcing steel products. In addition, many governments in developed economies are increasingly focused on addressing housing affordability challenges. Policies aimed at expanding residential construction could support additional demand for long steel products in the medium term. Another positive factor for certain markets is the implementation of measures designed to protect domestic industries from unfairly priced imports. While these measures support local producers, they also reduce market access opportunities for exporting countries, highlighting the differing impacts across regions. There are areas like the Balkan and Baltic regions where demand is really great and investment in infrastructure is huge.

China’s crude steel output decreases, its iron ore imports increase

China’s crude steel production decreased by 4.1 percent in January-April, but its iron ore imports increased by eight percent to 418 million mt in the same period, and port stocks are close to 160 million mt. This is a very strange situation: steel production is characterized by weakness, but iron ore imports remain strong.

Divergence between open and protected markets

Competition remains extremely intense in international markets that are open to imports. Excess production capacity in several regions continues to put pressure on prices and margins. In contrast, markets that benefit from trade protection measures or restricted import access generally experience more balanced competitive conditions.

Current market status stable and challenging, outlook varies according to region

Under these circumstances, the current status of the market can be described as stable and challenging. While demand remains generally subdued in many regions, market participants have largely adapted to current conditions and no major short-term disruptions are anticipated. The outlook, on the other hand, varies significantly by region. In Europe and the United States, market sentiment is relatively decent, supported by infrastructure spending and protective trade measures. In many other parts of the world, however, the outlook remains difficult to predict.

Supply side will need to be monitored if Middle East crisis is resolved

Even if geopolitical tensions in the Middle East ease, the resulting increase in availability of supply could place additional pressure on already oversupplied open-trade markets. Furthermore, the current interest rate environment continues to weigh on construction activity and investment decisions in several regions.

DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE?  

PLEASE LEAVE A COMMENT AND SHARE YOUR OPINION WITH US

Weighted-average dumping margins likely to prevail if the orders were revoked are up to

• 60.40 percent for Argentina,
• 86.09 percent for Colombia,
• 29.72 percent for Egypt,
• 72.28 percent for Indonesia,
• 19.26 percent for Italy,
• 26.95 percent for Malaysia,
• 30.86 percent for the Netherlands,
• 194.40 percent for Saudi Arabia,
• 155.10 percent for South Africa,
• 14.75 percent for Spain,
• 23.89 percent for Taiwan,
• 30.58 percent for Tunisia,
• 53.65 percent for Türkiye,
• 19.30 percent for Ukraine,
• 170.65 percent for the UAE

The AD orders were originally issued on February 1, 2021, for Argentina, Colombia, Egypt, the Netherlands, Saudi Arabia, Taiwan, Türkiye, and the UAE, and on June 4, 2021, for Indonesia, Italy, Malaysia, South Africa, Spain, Tunisia, and Ukraine. The sunset reviews were initiated on January 2, 2026, and the final results were published on May 4, 2026.

Net countervailable subsidy rates likely to prevail if the order were revoked are

• 68.74 percent for Celik Halat ve Tel San A.S.,
• 95.29 percent for Guney Celik Hasir ve Demir,
• 82.29 percent for all others.

The CVD order on PC strand from Türkiye was originally issued on February 3, 2021. The sunset review was initiated on January 2, 2026, and the final results were published on May 4, 2026.

The DOC determined that Tosyali Iron Steel Industry Algeria made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value during the period of review. The DOC has determined a weighted-average dumping margin of 127.32 percent for the company and all other Algerian producers and exporters.

According to the preliminary determination, the weighted-average dumping margin was also determined at 127.32 percent.

The regulation sets the total annual tariff-rate quota at 18,345,922 mt, while imports within the quota will remain duty-free, while volumes exceeding the quota will be subject to a 50 percent tariff, a sharp increase compared to the previous 25 percent safeguard duty.

This measure applies broadly to all third countries, including those with free trade agreements or preferential access, reinforcing the EU’s efforts to prevent trade diversion and protect domestic producers. However, imports originating from Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein are excluded from the scope of the measure. The European Commission also retains the authority to expand the scope to include downstream steel products in future reviews.

The tariff-rate quotas will be administered on a quarterly basis, aiming to prevent import surges within short periods. During the first year of implementation, unused quotas will be carried over to subsequent quarters. However, the commission may later adjust this rule depending on market conditions, including import pressure and supply shortages.

The European Commission will:

• review the product scope regularly,
• assess the effectiveness of the measure every three years,
• potentially adjust quota volumes within a range of 14.4-22.2 million mt depending on market developments.

Annual volumes of tariff rate quotas for some steel products are listed below.

• Merchant Bars and Light Sections  :  881,735 mtons
• Rebars    : 844,526 mtons
• Wire Rods   : 1,569,532 mtons

In a joint statement, the European Parliament, the Council and the European Commission underlined that the EU has taken unprecedented steps since the start of the war to reduce its economic dependence on Russia and prevent its economic activity from supporting Russia’s war efforts.

However, the institutions acknowledged that some dependencies still remain, particularly for certain steel products that are not yet fully restricted. Limited volumes of Russian steel imports are therefore still permitted under transitional arrangements until September 30, 2028, with quotas that decrease annually. The EU confirmed that these measures are designed to ensure a complete phase-out of remaining Russian steel imports by the 2028 deadline.

There were 99 representatives from 41 different producers among the 386 registered delegates from a total of 49 different countries. There were also 86 registrations representing 41 different raw material suppliers.

At the opening of the conference, Ioannis Manessis, chairman of IREPAS, said that two major conflicts – one in Ukraine and the other in Iran — have consequences for global trade in general and serious repercussions for the industry in particular. He said steel trade has been affected by both demand destruction and supply disruptions, as well as by elevated energy costs, higher freight rates and the practical difficulty of securing vessels on time to transport materials.

Mr Manessis added that protectionism continues to intensify at the same time. IREPAS chairman also said that real demand in the global long products sector remains subdued while geopolitical tensions have driven up freight, energy, and raw material costs. Combined with some degree of inventory replenishment, this has supported higher prices he concluded.

On the last day of the conference, producers of long steel products, as well as traders and raw material suppliers, shared the conclusions reached at their special committee meetings regarding the current situation in the markets with the general participants at the event.

Raw Material Suppliers at IREPAS: Tighter supply, geopolitics reshape global scrap market

Speaking at the panel session, Jens Björkman from Stena Metal International and also chairman of the raw material suppliers committee, shared the committee’s assessments of the current dynamics and difficulties in the global raw material markets. Mr. Björkman highlighted significant shifts in global market dynamics over the past year, pointing to tighter supply conditions, changing trade flows and increasing geopolitical influence on pricing and demand. One of the key developments has been the slowdown in Chinese steel output, with March production falling to the lowest monthly level in six years. This decline, linked to weaker margins and stricter controls, has supported sentiment in other regions, while iron ore prices have remained relatively firm at $105-110/mt due to supply-side constraints. India continues to stand out as a major growth market, supported by strong domestic sponge iron production. This has reduced its reliance on scrap imports, although the country could be an attractive destination, based on freight costs and pricing conditions.

The chairman of the raw material suppliers committee stated that, in Europe, safeguard measures and regulatory frameworks have reinforced protectionist dynamics, supporting intra-regional scrap demand. However, concerns persist over high energy costs and the risk of stagflation, which could weigh on longer-term demand. In the United States, stronger domestic steel production has boosted internal demand for raw materials. At the same time, the attractiveness of scrap exports has declined, particularly for high-quality grades, as supply increasingly shifts toward domestic consumption.

Mr. Björkman pointed out that Turkey has seen improved sentiment, supported by stronger steel production and demand. Reduced semis supply from Iran has increased reliance on scrap imports, pushing prices to around $410/mt, an annual high. Rising freight costs, driven by higher bunker fuel prices and disruptions of oil shipments through the Strait of Hormuz, have further supported pricing.

Mr. Björkman emphasized that there is no global surplus of scrap supply, as scrap continues to be steadily consumed. Europe exports around 19-20 million mt annually, reflecting limited domestic demand growth, but future availability may tighten due to increasing EAF adoption and regulatory constraints. Traditional importers in the Middle East may face challenges as scrap availability tightens in Europe and the US. Meanwhile, he noted, growing scrap generation and processing capacity in Asia, particularly in China and India, could gradually reshape global trade flows.

Mr. Björkman said that increasing regulatory requirements, particularly EU waste shipment rules, are expected to drive investment in sorting and processing. At the same time, tighter credit conditions and reduced availability of trade finance are adding complexity to global scrap trade. He went on to say that, despite strong pricing and demand conditions, the market outlook remains uncertain. Energy prices, economic growth and geopolitical developments continue to pose risks, while elevated oil prices at around $110 per barrel are still considered manageable for now. However, in conclusion, he commented that any deterioration in demand or purchasing power could quickly shift the market into a more challenging phase.

Traders at IREPAS: Geopolitical tensions and higher costs disrupt steel trade flows

Speaking during the panel session, Wilhelm Alff, director at Duferco and chairman of the traders committee, shared the committee’s assessment of current market conditions, highlighting weakening demand, regulatory pressures and rising geopolitical risks. Mr. Alff reminded that crude steel production in China reached around 960 million mt in 2025, while data from the first quarter of 2026 indicate that output may decline further or at best remain stable, with no clear signs of growth. In China, the sharpest drop was observed in the rebar segment, in which production fell by 12 percent, reflecting the ongoing downturn in the construction sector. The only improvement in China was the growth of more than 10 percent in iron ore inventories, mainly due to strategic stock building, highlighting the disconnect between raw material positioning and weak end-user demand.

This weakness in demand is particularly evident in Europe, where the overall economic outlook remains poor. Public spending is increasingly being redirected toward defense and social support rather than infrastructure, especially in Germany, limiting the recovery potential for steel consumption. The committee also pointed out that existing production capacity in the EU continues to exceed demand, noting that even prolonged production stoppages by major producers have had little visible impact on the market. A key concern for traders remains the implementation of the EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM). The committee chairman emphasized that, in the current environment, traders are advised to use default emission values when calculating CBAM costs in order to avoid risks, although this approach increases cost exposure. Uncertainty surrounding calculation methods and verification procedures continues to complicate transactions, making it essential to involve producers and clearly define contract terms.

In addition, recent changes to the EU safeguard system have added further pressure. Quotas have been reduced by nearly 50 percent, while out-of-quota duties may rise to as high as 50 percent. Market participants criticized the lack of adjustment in country-specific quotas, even where suppliers have not delivered material for extended periods. As a result, portions of the quota system remain effectively unusable, further tightening supply and negatively affecting buyers and end-users in the region. Against this backdrop, traders also highlighted the growing impact of geopolitical tensions, particularly in the Middle East. According to Mr. Alff, escalating tensions have tightened raw material supply chains and pushed costs higher, significantly slowing trading activity. Mills are increasingly relying on short-term sourcing strategies and opportunistic cargoes, while additional costs for transporting billets overland from Omani ports are estimated at around $40/mt. Severe port congestion is further complicating trade flows, making execution increasingly difficult. Despite these disruptions, the committee believes that the current situation is still being treated as temporary rather than structural. However, logistical constraints, especially in key maritime routes, continue to limit cargo movements and add uncertainty to global trade.

Commenting on global trade flows, Mr. Alff noted that exporters are likely to face growing challenges in accessing traditional markets. Tightening EU quotas and rising protectionism are forcing suppliers to seek alternative destinations, though options are becoming increasingly limited as more countries introduce similar trade barriers. Africa is expected to remain a key growth market in the medium term, supported by rising imports from Asia, particularly China, although the expansion of local production capacity and potential protectionist measures could gradually slow this trend.

Regarding China, the committee expects semi-finished steel exports to remain at elevated levels but under tighter control, as the Chinese authorities are likely to manage trade flows more actively to avoid another sharp surge. While the ongoing crisis in the Gulf region could support demand for Chinese material, its impact will largely depend on logistical conditions and the ability to move cargoes efficiently.

Looking at other regions, market conditions in the US and Latin America were described as relatively stable, with the US benefiting from solid demand driven by public infrastructure projects.

Overall, the traders committee underlined that the global steel market is entering a period of heightened uncertainty, shaped by weak demand in key regions, regulatory changes and geopolitical risks. In such an environment, Alff concluded that it is extremely difficult to predict price trends, emphasizing that market participants will need to continuously monitor developments and adjust their strategies accordingly.

Producers at IREPAS: Global steel sector under pressure from costs and weak growth

Alex Gordienko, export director of Spain’s CELSA Group and representing the producers committee, stated, in sharing the producers committee’s findings, that the global steel industry is facing increasing pressure from rising costs, weak economic growth and regulatory complexity. He noted that uncertainty remains high, particularly due to ongoing geopolitical tensions. Mr. Gordienko indicated that raw material prices have risen significantly, while the ability to pass these costs on to customers remains limited. As a result, margins across the industry are under sustained pressure, with finished steel prices failing to fully reflect higher input costs.

Mr. Gordienko noted that economic growth remains subdued across many regions, limiting the potential for a meaningful recovery in steel demand. He warned that current conditions reflect a fragile balance, with demand holding but lacking strong momentum. He described energy markets as highly volatile, largely due to tensions in the Middle East, adding that there is no clear timeline for a resolution and that a prolonged conflict could significantly worsen market conditions.

Mr. Gordienko went on to state that trade policy remains a key theme, with the EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) at the center of discussions.

CBAM is seen as a mechanism that will gradually level carbon costs globally, encouraging countries such as Turkey, China and India to develop their own carbon pricing systems.

He said that, while CBAM is not expected to trigger immediate price changes, producers anticipate a medium-term disruption. By 2027, mills with verified emissions data are expected to gain a competitive advantage, as buyers increasingly prioritize suppliers able to provide reliable carbon data. Currently, only a limited number of suppliers, particularly in Japan and South Korea, are fully prepared for these requirements.

Meanwhile, the other restrictive factor, he pointed out, is that a new quota system stricter than the EU’s framework is expected to be introduced in the UK.

Mr. Gordienko commented that logistical challenges are adding further pressure, particularly in the Middle East, where port congestion is disrupting cargo flows. Limited truck availability and rising freight costs, driven by higher bunker fuel prices and fuel shortages, are increasing delivery costs for producers. He also stated that production disruptions in Iran have significantly affected global semis supply. Publicly available information indicates that facilities representing around 10 million mt of capacity have been heavily damaged, with recovery timelines ranging from six to 12 months. Iran exported approximately 3 million mt of semis in 2025, with around 75 percent directed to Asia. The disruption has contributed to increased Chinese semi-finished exports, particularly in March, as China moved to fill the supply gap. In the meantime, diesel shortages in Europe and transportation constraints are further amplifying cost pressures, with freight rates rising faster than oil prices.

On the raw materials side, Gordienko stated that availability remains a structural constraint. European producers, heavily reliant on scrap for electric arc furnace-based production, face limited flexibility in switching to alternative inputs such as HBI due to high energy requirements. This suggests limited short-term changes in production routes.

Lastly, he shared his prediction regarding the market outlook. Despite relatively stable demand and pricing conditions, the overall outlook remains uncertain. In conclusion, he said that energy prices, geopolitical developments and cost pressures continue to pose significant risks, leaving the global steel industry in a fragile and unpredictable environment.

The DOC has determined that revocation of the antidumping duty and countervailing duty orders on the given products from Mexico and Turkey would likely to lead to the continuation or reoccurrence of dumping, countervailable subsidies and material injury.

The estimated weighted-average dumping margin for Mexico are at 20.58 percent and 66.70 percent, while subsidy rates are 6.58 percent and 7.71 percent for Turkish companies.

The products subject to the orders are currently classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under subheadings 7213.10.0000, 7214.20.0000, and 7228.30.8010.